Clemmie Burkleo: in my view it's due to not Intelligent enough human species.however there are claims that it sa a hoax and lot of fighting going on number of communities.i don't care what every one thinks in my view we are ruining the environment.
Carlton Lastrapes: We had a good run, but we couldn't keep on raping the planet like we do forever without any consequences, and now we are starting to pay them
Stevie Kizziar: The effect here and in a lot of places across the globe was record cold temperatures this winter. Go figure.
Claude Gloden: if you believe in global warming then you are either EMO or GAY
Willa Holte: Maybe, but then do volcanoes, natural forest and prairie fires, oceanic vents and animals (discharge methane and carbon dioxide) also go on trial for this 'crime'?
Chastity Doderer: Yes I think so. James Delingpole talks to Professor Ian Plimer, the Australian geologist, whose new book shows that ‘anthropogenic global warmin! g’ is a dangerous, ruinously expensive fiction, a ‘first-world luxury’ with no basis in scientific fact. Shame on the publishers who rejected the bookImagine how wonderful the world would be if man-made global warming were just a figment of Al Gore’s imagination. No more ugly wind farms to darken our sunlit uplands. No more whopping electricity bills, artificially inflated by EU-imposed carbon taxes. No longer any need to treat each warm, sunny day as though it were some terrible harbinger of ecological doom. And definitely no need for the $7.4 trillion cap and trade (carbon-trading) bill â€" the largest tax in American history â€" which President Obama and his cohorts are so assiduously trying to impose on the US economy.Imagine no more, for your fairy godmother is here. His name is Ian Plimer, Professor of Mining Geology at Adelaide University, and he has recently published the landmark book Heaven And Earth, which is going to change forever the way we think about! climate change.‘The hypothesis that human activity can crea! te global warming is extraordinary because it is contrary to validated knowledge from solar physics, astronomy, history, archaeology and geology,’ says Plimer, and while his thesis is not new, you’re unlikely to have heard it expressed with quite such vigour, certitude or wide-ranging scientific authority. Where fellow sceptics like Bjorn Lomborg or Lord Lawson of Blaby are prepared cautiously to endorse the International Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) more modest predictions, Plimer will cede no ground whatsoever. Anthropogenic global warming (AGW) theory, he argues, is the biggest, most dangerous and ruinously expensive con trick in history.To find out why, let’s meet the good professor. He’s a tanned, rugged, white-haired sixtysomething â€" courteous and jolly but combative when he needs to be â€" glowing with the health of a man who spends half his life on field expeditions to Iran, Turkey and his beloved Outback. And he’s sitting in my garden drinking tea! on exactly the kind of day the likes of the Guardian’s George Monbiot would probably like to ban. A lovely warm sunny one....Show more
Vida Miss: highly using fuels like petrol,diesel etc.to reduce it we must reduce them by using others which are free from pollution,by increasing the forest areas we can reduce global warming.
Omar Phipps: There has never been any causal link proved between CO2 emissions and global temperature increase. In general the temperature follows the solar activity cycles. Temperatures have been increasing on average since 1850. Which incidentally is the same time that "the little ice age" came to an end. The Earth was unnaturally cool for about 500 years before that. And before that was known as the "Medieval warm period" During which time it was far warmer than it is now. In the 1300's northern England was warm enough to grow vineyards. The climate is a complex system impacted by many variables. Some of these studies that allegedly p! rove global warming base their findings on only a few years worth of da! ta. They have no idea what the "normal" temperature of the planet is. So how can they possibly know if the current temperature trends are abnormal? You know people have abandoned anything approaching true science when they say the debate is over and no more evidence will be considered. And any time a scientist or scientific institute acknowledges doubts about global warming they are ridiculed and marhginalized by those that are making millions by using this theory to scare people into "going green" True science is all about uncertainty....Show more
Torri Tippey: There is no impact. Its not real
Anibal Scheid: shouldn't there be a CNN news man on the beach in miami with a yard stick measuring the water rising by global warming? (sarcasum) or is it going to kerplunk all at one time like a tsunami? come on? i see it raining like hell, but that's Elnino!!!!!!! and they didn't predict that untill it was right on top of us. so when the water really rises? it will be ! to late.
Ambrose Mumma: Act, The Kyoto Agreement, Financial services Act, health and safety at work Act
Shon Almquist: Global warming and cooling happen, and are 100% natural. Man can't influence the climate in any major way.
Floy Fague: Ok... when the philippene volcanos erupted... they put more carbon dioxide in the air than humanity has ever produced and there was no temperature change.
Sunshine Holets: I think man kind would be sentenced to death
Judie Kise: Global warming is a serious threat to the planet. If people want to stop it, they need to do their part and change their lifestyle habits (ex:instead of driving, people could use more and more public transportation or walk). Landfills should start using waste to energy as a way to stop the release of methane gases caused by trash (people also need to recycle frequently and reduce their waste. As for stores, they need to recycle all of their plastic bags and encourage people to use clot! h bags to put groceries and other items inside). Big businesses should ! get stiff fines (in the tens of millions of dollars) if they continue to pollute. As for the governments, they need to act now, not later....Show more
Mark Villifana: The consensus of scientists could serve as adequate evidence. Ignoring the "most likely" scenario could make political and corporate leaders culpable, particularly if there is evidence that they understood the majority of the evidence was against them, but still crafted a specific strategy to resist and deny it (as in the case of ExxonMobil, and as is likely with the Bush Admininistration with their incorporation of oil industry representatives to craft their energy policies).Look what happened with the tobacco companies. They're still in court, paying damages.I predict that within 20-30 years politicians will bow to public pressure to allow affected to hold corporations responsible (politicians will need a clear scapegoat to take focus off of them). ExxonMobil will be the first one on trial, perhaps ! along with any coal companies investing in propaganda or political favors to fast-track coal-fired power plants....Show more
Angelyn Ducas: It's likely happening, but it's a natural occurrence. The earth has gone through several periods of climate change over billions of years. It's manged to heat up and cool down on it's own without people being there. I don't think humans caused it or can do anything to stop it.
Becky Mosena: Global warming reducing: Shut down all the petrol stations, etc etc. Go back to the horse and cart days... or build cars that run off solar & make them available for people on budgets aswel as the rich. I believe the way our climate is, is here to stay. People DONT listen, people are lazy to give a thought on what we are doing to the planet, and what we may be doing to our kids kids futures. We are getting more and more natural disasters, fires, dust storms, quakes blah blah blah, but no body cares... it will stay that way until it is too! late to change anything... it is too late even now!...Show more
! Jeannetta Gaffigan: is the circumstantial evidence enough to remove a reasonable doubt?
Stormy Beliard: The effects of Global Warming are the melting of the polar ice caps, and event which is already taking place. The rising of sea water due to melting of the polar ice caps. And the loss of land due to rising ocean waters. It doesn't mean everyone's winter will suddenly get warmer. Storms will get more violent. This is already happening. Spring will come earlier. Then if there is a sudden cold snap, the insects birds need to feed their young will die and so will the baby birds, This too is already happening. There are other changes too numerous to mention. Just look at NASAs photos of the polar ice caps shrinking!...Show more
Octavio Roylance: None of those would or will. However, ostensibly, the binding Kyoto Agreement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocolthat is still in force (in theory) http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-protects-its-i...is su! pposed to do that by reducing the atmospheric contribution of CO2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keeling_Curveby the 40 "Annex 1" countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Framew...However, in reality, the Kyoto Protocol would not have done that even if it were in force, because it was only designed to move the CO2 production from Annex 1 countries to other places http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2009/10/measurin...and generate nuclear weapons capability in all third world countries http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Clean_D...rather than actually reduce CO2 emissions.The treaty was effectively killed with the Copenhagen Accord in December 2010. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_Accord...Show more
Stanton Valdivia: Look at how global warming is described. It's impossible to talk about global warming without using the words "may", "probably", "possibly" "could be", The case would be one that any person could win after watching 3 episodes of "! Law and Order". You wouldn't even need to be a lawyer.
Leisa Bro! dnex: Who would be the jury? Who would be the judge? This is a pure work of fiction to stir up emotions. Man was put on Earth to take advantage of every available recource to create a good standard of living.I like the lack of evidence answers and I planned on using them but since they were written already I will not say the same.Not everything Man does is evil....Show more
Bernie Cerra: I agree with the Milankovitch cycles
Scot Rotruck: There is no credible science that supports the notion of 'Man-did-it' global warming.The 'Man-did-it' cult has based their claim on faulty surface temperature data.Most unfortunate is the effort to brainwash our school children into believing in 'Man-did-it' global warming. There is simply no credible evidence of it....Show more
Ervin Laeger: The defendant would be found not guilty based on scientific evidence.
William Vickerman: No, man would be acquitted because of lack of evidence.
Weldon Totaro:
Jon! Bergmeier: They would plead "ignorance" or "we didn't know", just like the tobacco industry and chemical industry in the past.Right now they are still in the total denial phase and for some reason they have the extreme religious people on there side because something to do with god didn't give man a gift like coal and oil and have it be bad for us.
Florencio Dingle: In my opinion the circumstantial evidence would be enough to find mankind guilty. First, there has been considerable increase in global warming since mankind started driving cars and put away the horse and buggy. Secondly, at least in the US, we throw away way more than we recycle. Many plastics should be banned. It takes a disposable diaper forever to disintegrate. The same with the plastic bags the grocery store gives us the option of taking. If I could do what I want I would go back to using a horse for transportation, stop paving our planet and go back to a more natural way of life....Show more
! Betsey Muehlbach: I doubt that it is man made. Here is a well written ! article on th topic.http://www.nationscrier.com/index.php?option=com_c...
No comments:
Post a Comment